According to the supplied campaign text, no. The legal focus is described as state-to-state and does not alter current domestic property ownership.
The proposed fund would use recovered international reparations to purchase land on the open market from willing sellers.
The campaign describes the Bill as budget-neutral, with commission and fund operations financed through settlements, arbitral payouts and lawful recovery from foreign commercial sovereign assets.
The supplied proposal states that protected embassies, consular buildings and official diplomatic operating accounts remain exempt; contemplated enforcement is limited to non-diplomatic commercial assets.
The campaign argues that recent repudiation of the doctrine creates an international-law basis for re-examining the historic justification of pre-1913 dispossession.
Public participation
Help shape the public record.
Sign the petition, attend a provincial consultation or volunteer to support public education.